Showing posts with label Hulk. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Hulk. Show all posts

Thursday, 31 May 2012

The History of Comics Pt III: The Silver Age of Comics (But as Good as Gold!)

[If you haven't yet read my entry on The Golden Age of Comics - STOP!  Then follow up part two - Who Killed The Golden Age?]


In the third entry on the history of comics, we now enter The Silver Age of Comics.

At the closing of the Golden Age of Comics, soldiers returned from the war, superhero comics began to decline, and other genres such as war, westerns, crime, horror, science fiction, and romance began to hit the stands.  DC heroes (then National Comics) like Green Lantern (Alan Scott), Flash (Jay Garrick), and other members of the Justice Society of America were pulled, while Superman, Batman, and Wonder Woman continued to print, albeit modestly.  Horror and crime comics took things to new levels, and Fredric Wertham, psychiatrist and author of Seduction of the Innocent, coupled with the United States Senate Subcommittee on Juvenile Delinquency, led the charge against comic books.  And from the book burnings, the pressure from the government, and the avoidance of a government-sanctioned body overseeing comic book publications, comic book publishers formed the Comics Code Authority to monitor published content.

The short lived journey of crime and horror comics at the top was coming to an end, and it was time for superhero comics to strike again - and strike they did, with a bolt of lightning!

DC Comics

Barry Allen's first appearance as the Flash,
hastily ushering in the Silver Age

DC Comics sought to bring lighter-hearted, fun, adventurous comics back to the forefront.  While Superman, Batman, and Wonder Woman had continued to sell, editor Julius Schwartz decided to revamp the other heroes of the 30's and 40's.  Himself a fan of science fiction, Schwartz looked to reimagine DC's heroes with a scientific twist.  Thus, the following changes were made:

Hal Jordan's 1st Appearance
  • 1940's Flash, Jay Garrick, was replaced by police officer Barry Allen, who, while working in a crime lab, was struck by lightning and made a super speedster.  After reading a comic book about The Golden Age Flash, Barry decided to take the name for himself.  The new Flash's appearance in 1956's Showcase #4 (shown above) is generally regarded by historians as the first issue of The Silver Age.
  • 1940's Green Lantern, Alan Scott, whose ring was operated by a magic lantern, was replaced by test pilot Hal Jordan, who was given a ring and lantern after being inducted into an intergalactic police corps, the Green Lanterns, by an alien group known as the Guardians of the Universe.
  • DC updated other heroes, including The Atom (professor Ray Palmer, physicist) and Hawkman (Katar Hol, an alien from the planet Thanagar).
  • Aquaman was retconned and given a new origin and history.
  • DC introduced new characters, like J'onn J'onnz, the Martian Manhunter.
J'onn J'onnz, manhunter from Mars



The new changes by DC were a hit, and once again, superheroes began to flourish and thrive.  Crossovers began, with heroes appearing in each other's titles, until DC introduced their flagship mega-team, the Justice League of America.

Justice League's 1st Appearance: Brave and the Bold #28


And later, following the popularity of team-ups, DC had sidekicks join forces to create the Teen Titans:

Brave and the Bold #54

DC Comics, now a publishing giant in the 50s and 60s, paved the road for the new superhero era.  It was during this time that DC decided they would do something radical - bring back the original heroes.

The Flash #123 - a landmark issue.  It also recently sold for $83,000
Flash (Barry Allen) was able to vibrate his molecules so fast, he was able to escape our plane of existence - and land himself on Earth-Two, the home of the original Flash, Jay Garrick (confused?  Wait till we get into the multiverse).

Over time, Barry visited Jay and vice versa, and through creative ways eventually the whole Justice Society of America met with the Justice League of America, saving each other's bacon now and again.

DC was truly breaking new ground for the superhero genre - something comic writer Stan Lee took notice of.

Enter the Marvel Era


While mega stars like the current Flash and Green Lantern were created, and the Justice League became a sought after comic book for readers everywhere, the Silver Age of Comics cannot be spoken about without delving into the massive gains made by Marvel Comics and, notably, Stan Lee.

I shouldn't have to reiterate the awesomeness that is Stan Lee, because you've already gone ahead and read my introduction to Stan Lee in my blog Comic Names You Should Know: Stan Lee!  Besides, you already knew who he was prior to that anyhow, right?  Right?

But to showcase the work Lee accomplished during the Silver Age, let's again recall that Stan Lee co-created:


Spider-Man's first appearance, Amazing Fantasy #15.
Recently sold for $1.1 Million.  I want one... make it two.

  • Spider-Man
  • Iron Man
  • Hulk
  • Thor
  • Hawkeye
  • Nick Fury
  • The Avengers
  • The Fantastic Four
  • The Silver Surfer
  • The X-Men
  • Daredevil
  • Doctor Strange
Stan Lee looked at comics in the 40s and 50s, and saw what worked, and what didn't work.  Together, with Steve Ditko, Jack Kirby, John Romita, Sr., and many other incredible artists and writers, Stan began the Marvel Comics explosion.  Lee, like DC's Julius Schwartz, was a big fan of science fiction, and based most of his superhero's powers on scientific reasoning (Iron Man's suit ran on Stark-powered transistors, Peter Parker's radioactive spider, Bruce Banner's gamma bomb radiation, cosmic radiation in the Fantastic Four, and so on).

And, playing off the popularity of super teams, Lee saw to the creation of the Fantastic Four, the X-Men, and a comic book that took singular heroes and paired them together, The Avengers.

The Avengers Versus Loki?
Hmm... they should make a movie about that.....

Stan Lee, as editor of Marvel Comics, also introduced a new aspect to superhero comics - the reluctant, self-loathing superhero.  Peter Parker, aka Spider-Man, would battle a villain, but as a result frequently miss a high school test, lose his job, or end up not getting the girl.  Bruce Banner constantly avoided becoming the Hulk, as he was powerless when the rage took over.  The Fantastic Four acted as a super team, but while Reed Richards could control his stretching, Susan Storm wasn't always invisible, and Johnny Storm could toggle his Human Torch guise,  Ben Grimm was permanently disfigured and viewed as a monster when he was cosmically altered into the Thing.

At a time when DC Comics's heroes were becoming over-the-top (Superman's powers escalated to the point that he could now move planets with his hands), Marvel Comics's humanizing traits, historians argue, are what drew in teenage crowds and jetted Marvel Comics into the spotlight.

Another key point for Marvel was that Stan Lee like to place his heroes in familiar settings - like New York City (Peter Parker grew up in Queens, the Fantastic Four's headquarters, the Baxter Building, was located in Manhattan, etc), as opposed to DC's imaginary locations of Gotham City, Metropolis, and Smallville.  In fact, Lee placed almost all of his characters in New York City, giving more justification as to why the heroes would cross paths regularly.  Placing the heroes in locations that Lee was familiar with helped with the writing process, as well as made fans more easily identify with the characters.

With all these comics in the market, it was only a matter of time until superheroes took over other mediums - notably television.

Comics-to-Television


The 60s & 70s saw a lot of superheroes on TV, some incarnations good, some mediocre (but never bad - I mean, hey, they're comics!).  Perhaps I'll do a more thorough review of this later, but for now, he's some of the major ones to recall, and likely the ones you're most familiar with.


Batman

In 1966, Batman made his TV debut, starring Adam West as the titular hero.  I don't believe there's a lot of explanation required here - the theme song alone should refresh your memory.  If you don't remember the show at all, here's a quick explanation:

  • Burt Ward, as Robin, consistently said, "Holy ___, Batman!" ( ___ not meant to represent a curse word).  See here for examples.
  • Mickey from the Rocky movies (Burgess Meredith) was the Penguin - though chronologically that means the Penguin was Rocky's coach.
  • The Joker, played by Caesar Romero, had a moustache whited-out with makeup because the actor wouldn't shave it for the role.
  • There were three actresses to portray Catwoman: Eartha Kitt, Lee Meriweather, and Julie Newmar.
  • Frank Gorshin expertly portrayed The Riddler.
Because the Comics Code Authority had neutered comics, this campy representation of Batman made it to the air.  Respectfully, it did extremely well at first, which even prompted the 1966 Batman movie.  By the third season, the TV show pressured DC Comics to introduce (Batwoman and Batgirl had already come and been dismissed) reintroduce a female character so one can be featured in the show, and so Barbara Gordon made her debut as Batgirl.  The character was then portrayed on the small screen by Yvonne Craig.



What was it about those hip people in the '60s?  They sure knew how to write a catchy jingle back then.  To get the neurons firing in an effort to recollect this show, here's the Spider-Man theme song.

And for no reason except that I like it, here's the song sung by Michael Buble.

As for the show, which debuted in 1967, the key highlights are:

  • Decent acting talent
  • A lot of shots of Spider-Man web-swinging and sticking to walls (to save money, shots were reused over and over again, like the background scenes of any episode of The Flintsones)
  • A decline in using villains from the comic book after season one
  • Footage from the show Rocket Robin Hood was reused in this show (no joke, check it out yourself)
Nevertheless, Spider-Man proved to be a big hit, and helped forever popularize the character.

All that Glitters isn't-- Silver?

Once again, superheroes took the lead in comic books, and made further mainstream leaps into television, radio, and film.  They had survived being the scapegoat of allegations by a mad doctor, and the onslaught that then ensued from the United States government.

The publishers themselves, however, may have become their own worst enemies, as the creation (however necessary) of the Comics Code Authority implemented stringent rules dictating the do's and don'ts of publishing a comic book.  The revitalization of superheroes sprang from this initial change, but ultimately altered the course of many heroes, forcing superhero comic books to become campy, silly versions of their prior incarnations.  Previously seen characters like Batman no longer tackled crooks and crime but now fought intergalactic beings, and carried shark repellent bat spray.  "And how come Batman doesn't dance anymore?  Remember the Batusi?"  Other heroes, like Superman, now had Krypto the Superdog, Streaky the Supercat, Comet the Super-Horse, and Beppo the Supermonkey.  Together, they formed the [*sigh*] Legion of Super-Pets.

While superheroes embarked on lighter antics than in the past, what was it that took the polish off the Silver, and ushered in the Bronze Age of Comics?  Like all other periods throughout history, no one person dictated the timeline of each era, so opinions vary depending on historians.

One historian and comics scholar, however, argues that the Bronze Age of Comics didn't get ushered in with a boom of lightning like the Silver Age, but instead appeared by a subtle, quiet "snap"...

[Stay tuned for my entry on The Bronze Age of Comics!]

Friday, 25 May 2012

Friday Fun-day!

I've been slowly compiling another historical piece to branch off from my initial piece, The Golden Age of Comics, but because it won't be finished today, I decided to let a little bit of the Joker out and go for inappropriate laughs!  Be sure to click on the images to enlarge them to read the text - usually key points, though sometimes the images themselves tell it all.

Mom & Dad, probably want to shut it down now.  If you read on, remember, I didn't draw these up.

ALL of these pictures have been lifted from superdickery.com - so a special thanks to them for brightening up our day.  The website started showcasing examples of Superman being, well, a dick, and evolved into a variety of humourous material, from scenes with unintentional homosexual undertones to scenes taken wildly out of context.  Nothing is off-limits.  With that, I bring you a few highlights - go to superdickery.com for more.

If you think I'm taking other people's work and putting my own comments on it, you'd be exactly right.  But this is a one time thing, I don't plan on making a career out of it.

Like I'd just take stuff from the Internet and jack it as my own material.

Who do you think I am, Daniel Tosh or something?

Green Lantern


I bet Ryan Reynolds asks to have this line put in "Green Lantern 2"

Superman

Nothing sketchy here!


Best leave this one alone.

...

Such confidence...

"Why won't Bruce return my calls...?"

Marvel Comics

The title says it all!

"Hulk... confused...?"


Wow.  Just wow.


Easy, Spider-Man!  That statement is exactly what got Sean Avery in trouble!

Hey!  What did I just say!

"Now, now, Thor's got enough mighty Mjolnir for everyone."


Looks like the Hulk's anger isn't the only thing raging!

Subtle Scenes...

I got your key to mystery, RIGHT HERE!

I don't know what comic this is from, but "Toni Gay?"  "Butch  Dykeman?"

Archie Comics

Read Betty's "offer" at the top right...

...

Interesting tactic to get the girl...

Batman

...


"Of the Year??"

This caption was placed here by design, not by accident.
I mean, somebody had to judge "Of the Year."

...


In the words of Archer, "Phrasing!"

Fredric Wertham's Seduction of the Innocent

Really?  Everybody thinks of their wife, you mention Robin??


...


If Batman and/or Robin are outed this June,
let's call this "precedence."


Hope you enjoyed a laugh!  Again, thanks to superdickery.com!  See you back here next week!
























Friday, 11 May 2012

Hulking Out of "The Avengers" - Should Ruffalo get his own Movie?

Everybody knows the Hulk smashes.  It appears, however, the only thing the Hulk hasn't been able to smash is the box office.

"What did puny writer say about Hulk movies?"

With the arrival of The Avengers, things may have changed.  Mark Ruffalo's performance as Bruce Banner has garnered positive reviews, and with Ruffalo signing a six-movie contract with Marvel, will they be willing to give him a chance to star in his own solo feature?  Ruffalo has already indicated he wants Marvel to give him this opportunity.

Should they bother? As you may remember, George Santayana said, "Those who cannot remember the past are condemned to repeat it."  Before we decide the fate of Ruffalo's Hulk, let's have a look at what worked, and what exactly went wrong the first few times around.

Ang Lee's Hulk (2003)


"...you won't like me when I'm angry..."

Years in the making, Hulk debuted in theatres in 2003.  Though initially a successful opening weekend (16th highest opening at the time), it dropped 70% by the following weekend, becoming the first movie to drop over 65% by the second weekend (see here for the financial stats).  Avi Arad, one of the producers, declared the film a financial disaster, though it essentially made it into the red through merchandising ("Merchandising, merchandising," - am I the only one that hears Yogurt's voice?).

"Do you have any flame throwers that come in Hulk?"

What Failed - I like Eric Bana.  I thought he did a fine job at playing Dr. Banner, our conflicted and reluctant hero.  And I truly, truly try hard when someone asks if I liked the film and if I would recommend it.  Oh, I give them an honest answer:  With a clenched smile, staring people in the eyes, I generally respond, "Yeah, I liked Hulk."  But I then usually feel as though I've cheated someone out of hours of their personal time, and before I know it I'm sputtering out a series of comments that seem to contradict that initial statement.

Roger Ebert, in his positive review of the movie, said, "Ang Lee is trying to actually deal with the issues in the story of the Hulk, instead of simply cutting to brainless visual effects."

In my opinion, I humbly offer that this was actually the worst aspect of the movie.  I'm not saying we need to go "Micheal Bay"-like here and cause mindless explosions and destruction and ignore plot and substance.  But I do contend that anybody who knows anything about the Hulk knows these simple points:
  1. Little guy gets hit with gamma radiation.
  2. When angered, he grows into the HULK.
That's it!  That's really all you need to know!!  Once the guy gets his atoms scrambled, he can stub his toe and watch out, here we go! So why is it in a Hulk movie that we don't see the title character for almost 90 minutes?

The insanely long exposition in this story made the movie way too long (over two hours).  I know I'm not the only one feeling this - to paraphrase Mick LaSalle of the San Francisco Chronicle, "...its epic length comes without an epic reward."  Does this make it an epic fail?

It would be like reading Strange Case of Dr. Jekyll & Mr. Hyde, and the whole movie you watch Dr. Jekyll formulating a potion and mulling over whether man is inherently good or bad, and then cap the movie off with a quick Hyde appearance and have him fight a bunch of irradiated dogs.

"I don't know where we went wrong, Mr. Lee."
As for the father versus son aspect, well, I don't know how or why it was involved in this story.  As far as I can honestly tell you, good reader, this was not part of the origin story.  Maybe a revamp somewhere along the Hulk's 50 year history (Wow! And not a gray hair on the green goon!), but I'm not aware of the comic story this was derived from... and truthfully, I don't really care to know (Okay, okay, I care.  I looked it up, but I couldn't find any details on it anyways).  My problem with it is I don't feel it helped to enrich the tale of the Hulk, offer a modern update (a man estranged from his father, what a twist!), or improve on any aspect - it only offered a different dynamic to the origin, and not one that I feel paid off.

One of the  reasons Superman Returns failed (there are many reasons) was because there wasn't any innovation, just another Superman versus Lex Luthor movie.  The "might versus mind" thing becomes tiresome (especially in that franchise).  We essentially saw the same thing in Hulk, where Bruce is up against his father's ideals and scientific schemes, something his muscles can't really combat.

In the end, it may be more apt of Marvel and Universal to have named the film Banner instead of Hulk.

Saving Grace - Ang Lee got his chops busted over this one, and as the director, I guess he really should have the final say.  But an excessively long script shouldn't completely fall on his shoulders.

Prior to Hulk, Lee had directed the cinematic beauty Crouching Tiger, Hidden Dragon.  In this way, one of the most noticeable things that makes Hulk stand out from other comic book movies is the way Lee screened his shots, and framed them comic-book style.  This made it entertaining and visually appealing.

Also, this is the only Hulk film that I've been able to actually notice the Hulk's strength being augmented by his rage.  In comics, his strength is directly proportional to how angry he is; insult him, he'll throw you through a wall, shoot him, and he'll throw you across town.  Bruce turning into the Hulk puts him at near 7 feet; enraged, he can be as large as 12 feet.  This version of the film actually used this angle in various scenes, a memorable one being when one of the mutant dogs is biting his shoulder and he grows so big it breaks its jaw (to see the dog fight in its whole go here, to see him "Hulk Out" and break its jaw go to the 3-minute mark).

The Incredible Hulk (2008)

"...I told you not to make him angry..."

Round two.  The intent here was to separate and ignore the first film, essentially reboot the franchise.  However, as the movie hits the ground running with an "infected" Bruce fleeing those that wish to imprison him, and does not really delve into the Hulk's origin too richly, many (including myself) see the film as a running sequel.
Producer Gale Ann Hurd felt, "We couldn't quite figure out how to term this... It's kind of a reboot and it's kind of a sequel... A "requel.""  When all else fails, Hulk-smash two words together.

What Failed - I really had to sit and think about this one.  The film debuted well - though its opening weekend was less than the first film - and it went on to gross a profitable margin.  Still, many couldn't help but compare the film to Marvel's explosive blockbuster earlier that summer, Iron Man.

One feature that may have suffered was marketing.  There was an apparent dispute between Edward Norton and the producers about the film's final cut.  Edward Norton, himself a Hulk fan, contributed a great deal towards Zak Penn's script, incorporating elements from the Marvel "Ultimate Universe" like the Hulk's relationship to Captain America and the super-soldier serum.  While Norton has gone on to say the dispute was fictitious, he was noticeably missing from some key panels and promotions, pulling a Dave Chappelle and leaving for Africa to do charity work.

Though I admit I would not compare this film to Iron Man's scale, front to back I felt this was a strong film.  So with this notion, let's discuss some of the film's highlights.

Saving Grace - I'll lead this segment with this excerpt from Rene Rodriguez of The Miami Herald, "...[the film] does a lot of things Lee's Hulk didn't: It's lighter and faster-paced, it's funnier and it embraces (instead of ignoring) the 1970s TV series that furthered the character's popularity."

Faster-paced, I think, is the key point here.  After a quick exposition scene to stage the film, Banner is next shown in South America, keeping out of the watchful eye of the government while still working on a cure.  The film quickly follows the pace of The Fugitive.

I also enjoyed how elements of "The Lonely Man" were incorporated into Bruce Banner's theme, a nod to The Incredible Hulk TV show theme song.  Again, embracing the Hulk's past, as noted in the above quote.

[2008 SPOILER ALERT] Finally, with Robert Downey Jr.'s appearance after the credits as Tony Stark, this movie is part of the Marvel Cinematic Universe, making it in-continuity with Iron Man, Thor, Captain America, thusly tying this Hulk's appearance to the one seen in The Avengers.  Unless you wish to consider The Avengers another "requel," well, then, that's up to you.


Final Thoughts


So what can we take away from these films?  I suggest taking heed of the following advice:

  1. Have Hulk fight a Hulk-sized villain.  Hulk fighting the military has been done twice now, and we know that the military really doesn't scare him.  Their bullets don't pierce his skin.  Besides, now that he's got Nick Fury on his side, SHIELD's rank supersedes that of the U.S. Military, making such a conflict irrelevant.   Having Hulk fight Abomination actually made our hero fight for his life.  As mentioned above, avoid another rendition of Superman versus Luthor, and aim for Superman versus Doomsday.

    [SPOILER ALERT - DON'T FOLLOW THE LINK BELOW IF YOU HAVEN'T SEEN THE AVENGERS]

    There's a certain villain at the final cut of The Avengers that would make for a good bout - maybe Hulk himself can avert the villain's first solo attempt at conquering Earth before the villain escalates his threat, making it require the whole team in Avengers 2.
  2. Have fun with it.  Learn from X-Men, Iron Man, and other successful Marvel franchises.  As there aren't actually real-life superheroes and massive mutant menaces running amok, don't take it too seriously.  Things can be on a global catastrophic scale and yet still be amusing.  Making it overly dramatic reverts us back to Ang Lee's Hulk.
  3. Continue to integrate other Marvel characters into your storyline.  Don't make them dominate your title feature, but even Captain America's shield in Iron Man 2 or Hawkeye's appearance in Thor was enough to satisfy fans.  However, considering how successful their rapport was in The Avengers, perhaps Tony Stark (as himself or as Iron Man) should play a prominent role as scientist or fellow hero, respectively.  Or, use this as an opportunity to introduce scientist Hank Pym.
  4. Most importantly, don't bother wasting everybody's time rebooting this franchise, even if Ruffalo is now the third actor to play the Hulk.  Nobody was overly confused when Batman was played by Michael Keaton, Val Kilmer, and George Clooney.  We got it.  Somebody new is in the title role, keep it going.  The only reason to reboot again would be if the first go-round caused the main protagonist to become unlikable, and it ruined the credibility of the characters to the extreme that you would have no choice but to reboot the title character and reset the universe.  I don't think Hulk hit this point.

Ruffalo has proven he's got the Banner part down, and Hulk was arguably one of the most enjoyable parts of The Avengers.  If given the right script, the right villain, and the right direction, it's easy to see we would have a box-office SMASH, one of HULK proportions!

"HULK HATE PUNY WRITER'S PUNS!!"

Tuesday, 8 May 2012

My Proposal...Or, What DC Can Learn from Marvel and "The Avengers"

I have always been a fan of DC Comics.


In the realm of movies, however, it can readily be argued that Marvel is doing a superior job marketing their properties.

Why?  Why is there such an issue in DC pumping out movies based upon their comic book properties?  Let's have a look....

Marvel Comics, initially, outsourced their movies.  Basically, they created Marvel Entertainment, and rented/sold their product to the highest bidder:

New Line Cinema - Blade, Blade II, Blade: Trinity

Fox - X-Men, X2: X-Men United, X-Men: The Last Stand, Daredevil, Elektra, Fantastic Four, Fantastic Four: Rise of the Silver Surfer

Universal - Hulk

Lionsgate - The Punisher

Sony - Spider-Man, Spider-Man 2, Spider-Man 3

Surely I'm missing some movies in there, but you get the point.  Marvel Entertainment, however, tried to maintain a say in the movies produced.  To further this point, Marvel Studios became more bold and confident, and started to produce their own movies, giving companies distribution rights instead.  This started with the more-modern era of Marvel comic movies:

Iron Man, Iron Man 2, The Incredible Hulk, Thor, Captain America: The First Avenger

and ultimately culminated in Disney taking notice, buying Marvel Entertainment, and releasing this year's box office smash, The Avengers.  For a more in-depth explanation and history of Marvel Studios, follow this link.

So, what started with Marvel "selling out" its properties resulted in a unification under one corporate head (for the most part, Sony still has rights to Spider-Man, hence Sony's reboot of The Amazing Spider-Man).

What about DC?  Where's their gusto, their go-get attitude?

Well, DC Comics has been under Warner Bros for an insanely long time.  Superman from 1978, for a leading example, was a Warner Bros production.

So, what's the deal?  Sure, not all of the Marvel films have been particularly spectacular - even Marvel has acknowledged this - but they took a swing at the ball.  And for every Marvel bomb, like Ang Lee's Hulk, most fans can still quip, "At least it's not Catwoman" - a DC property.  I know the obvious intent is to not lose money, but with "hero" comic movies at an all-time high, you'd think they would quit dragging their feet.  Maybe they feel they don't have to jump into the game, I mean, look at The Dark Knight.  Well, even for uber-successful DC films like The Dark Knight, you have films like Marvel's The Avengers.


"If You're So Smart, Why Aren't You Rich?"

Go ahead, call me on it.  I may not have all the answers, but I do recall reading something about how Warner Bros was so wrapped up in the Harry Potter franchise, that now that they've exhausted a good eight movies, they will be putting their attention into their comic book properties.  Let's see if that comes to fruition.

But until then, here's my proposal...

Christian Bale is done with the Batman franchise.  While the final movie of this trilogy hasn't been released yet, even if it's unlikable, this trilogy has garnered enough buzz that it will likely do well in the box office.  Spider-Man 3 did well in the box office, though it's well-accepted it's the worst of the three.

So now what?  Reboot Batman?  No.  It's done.  I know it sounds like blasphemy, especially from a dear fan of the protector of Gotham City.  But it's unnecessary to reboot.  Just move on, and pump up your other franchises.  Release next year's Superman film, Man of Steel.  Make Green Lantern 2.  Flash.  Wonder Woman.  Green Arrow.  Aquaman (with or without Vincent Chase).

You want to bridge these movies?  Find yourself a new actor to play Batman if Bale is definitely out, and have him fulfill the role of Samuel L. Jackson's Nick Fury, recruiting the heroes for a global threat under the title of the Justice League.

Wow.  Seems pretty simple, right?  Once more:
  1. Get some actors willing to sign 5 to 9 movie contracts (sounds extensive, yet Marvel is able to do it with high profile actors).
  2. Introduce the characters with modern retellings of their origin stories.
  3. Have Batman, a now properly established character with an origin story already firmly in place, bring the characters together to stop some sort of intergalactic force Wayne Industries detected - Darkseid, or perhaps Batman has already received a tip from J'onn J'onzz that the White Martians are ready to invade, whatever).
Warner Bros should have the chops to pull this off - they just seem to continuously shoot themselves in the foot with their own legal mumbo jumbo.  "We can't do this because Warner TV is doing that."  "We can't do this because the comics are doing that."  It's this short-sightedness that's leaving DC Comics any chance at franchising their properties always a few steps behind their competitor.  And now with Marvel having Disney's big bucks behind them, well, only Thanos himself could stop them now....

Oh, and kudos to anyone who noticed If You're So Smart, Why Aren't You Rich is the title of an episode of BTAS - the first appearance of The Riddler, to be exact.